Gerasimus, a Little-known Melkite Apologist
https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2025.28.4.003
Abstract
Gerasimus, abbot of the Monastery of St. Simeon the Stylite, located twenty kilometers from Antioch, is among the Arab Christian authors who have been unfairly overlooked by scholars. He remains a completely unknown figure in Russian scholarship. In this article, which should be considered an introduction to Gerasimus’ theology, the author aims to provide a general characterization of Gerasimus as an Arab Christian apologist. To achieve this goal, it was necessary to establish the time of Gerasimus’ literary activity, present his apologetic strategy, examine Gerasimus’ apologetics in the context of the Melkite theological-apologetic tradition, identify the features of his apologetics that distinguish him from previous authors, and, where possible, determine his patristic foundation. An analysis of Gerasimus’ main work, «The Complete Book of Healing Meaning» («Apology»), allows us to assume with a high degree of probability that this work was composed in the last third of the 13th century. Gerasimus’ apologetic strategy consists of creating a coherent system of Christian apologetics that allows for a rational justification of the truth of Christianity and its superiority over other religions. To achieve this goal, the Antiochene apologist develops a clear algorithm for defining the true religion; formulates criteria for identifying messengers who come preaching the true religion; and seeks out additional arguments in favor of the truth of the Christian faith. Being essentially the last writer in the line of medieval Melkite theologians and apologists, Gerasimus is closely connected to the preceding Melkite tradition. Thus, the apologetic strategy he developed reveals an undeniable dependence on the works of Theodore Abu Qurrah (d. c. 830). Gerasimus’ «Apology» share certain characteristics common to most Melkite theologians: he favors rational argumentation over biblical and patristic evidence, and makes no reference to the holy fathers. The influence of Muslim theology and Islamic culture in general on Gerasimus is undeniable. At the same time, his apologetics possesses a number of distinctive features that distinguish him from Orthodox Arabic-language authors and allow allow us to consider him a highly original thinker. «The Complete Book of Healing Meaning» is rightfully considered the finest theological and apologetic work of all Melkite authors of the 8th–13th centuries.
About the Author
archpriest O. DavydenkovRussian Federation
Archpriest Oleg Davydenkov - Doctor of Theology, PhD in Philosophy, Head of the Department of the History and Literature of the Ancient Eastern Churches at the Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University
6, bld. 1, Likhov lane, Moscow 127051
References
1. Моисеева С. А. Сюжет придворного диспута с иудеем в арабо-христианской агиографии // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия III: Филология. 2010. Вып. 4 (22). С. 32–43.
2. Селезнёв Н. Н. «Послание о единстве» багдадского мелькита в составе энциклопедического «Свода» арабоязычного копта XIII в. // Государство, религия, Церковь в России и за рубежом. 2010. № 3. С. 151–156.
3. Стрелецкий А. В. 1-й крестовый поход (1096–1099) // ПЭ. 2015. Т. 38. С. 568–571.
4. Awad N. G. Orthodoxy in Arabic Terms: A Study of Theodore Abu Qurra’s Theology in Its Islamic Context. Boston (Mass.); Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 2015. (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: Tension, Transmission, Transformation; vol. 3).
5. Bahkou A. Kitāb al-Kāfī fi-l-Maʿnā aš-Šāfī (The Complete Book of the Proper Meaning): The Christian Apology of Gerasimus // Parole de l’Orient. 2009. Vol. 34. P. 309–343.
6. Bahkou A., Lamoreaux J. Gerasimos // Christians Muslims Relations: A Biographical History: in 5 vols. Vol. 4: 1200–1350 / ed. by D. Thomas, A. Mallett et al. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2012. (History of Christian-Muslim Relations; vol. 17). P. 666–671.
7. Bertaina D. An Arabic Account of Theodore Abu Qurra in Debate at the Court of Caliph al-Ma’mun: A Study in Early Christian and Muslim Literary Dialogues. Washington, D. C.: Catholic University of America, 2007.
8. Glynias J. Baghdad on the Orontes: Between Greek and Arabic Intellectual Words in 11th-Century Antioch. PhD Thesis. Princeton (N. J.): Princeton University, 2022.
9. Graf G. Christliche Polemik gegen den Islam // Gelbe Hefte: Historische und politische Blätter für das katholische Deutschland. 1926. Hft. 2. S. 825–842.
10. Graf G. Geschischte der Christlichen Arabischen Literatur: in 5 Bde. Bd. 2. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1947. (ST; vol. 133).
11. Griffith S. H. The Controversial Theology of Theodore Abū Qurrah (c. 750 – c. 820 A.D.): A Methodological, Comparative Study in Christian Arabic Literature. PhD Thesis. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America, 1978.
12. Griffith S. H. Greek into Arabic: Life and Letters in the Monasteries of Palestine in the Ninth Century: The Example of the Summa Theologiae Arabica // Byzantion. 1986. T. 106. P. 117–138.
13. Griffith S. H. Arabic Christianity in the Monasteries of Ninth-Century Palestine. Aldershot; Burlington (Vt.): Ashgate, 1992.
14. Griffith S. H. Muslims and Church Councils: The Apology of Theodore Abū Qurrah // Studia patristica. 1993. Vol. 25. Р. 270–299.
15. Haddad R. La Trinité divine chez les théologiens arabes (750–1050). Paris: Beauchesne, 1985. (Beauchesne Religions; vol. 15).
16. Husseini S. L. Early Christian-Muslim Debate on the Unity of God: Three Christian Scholars and Their Engagement with Islamic Thought (9th Century C.E.). Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2014. (History of Christian-Muslim Relations; vol. 21).
17. Keating S. T. Defending the «People of Truth» in the Early Islamic Period: The Christian Apologies of Abū Rāʾiṭah. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2006. (History of Christian-Muslim Relations; vol. 4).
18. Nassif B. Religious Dialogue in the Eighth Century: Example from Theodore Abū Qurrah Treatise // Parole de l’Orient. 2005. Vol. 30. P. 333–340.
19. Nasrallah J. Histoire du mouvement littéraire dans l’église melchite du Ve au XXe siècle. Vol. 2/2: 750 – Xe s. Louvain: Peeters, 1981.
20. Nasrallah J. Histoire du mouvement littéraire dans l’église melchite du Ve au XXe siècle. Vol. 3/2: 1250–1516. Louvain: Peeters, 1988.
21. Naṣrī W. Abū Qurrah wa-al-Mẚmun: al-Mujādalah. Beirut; Jounieh: CEDRAC; Librairie St Paul, 2010.
22. Ricks T. W. Developing the Doctrine of the Trinity in an Islamic Milieu: Early Arabic Christian Contributions to Trinitarian Theology. PhD Thesis. Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America, 2012.
23. Samir S. Kh. Un traité du cheikh Abū ‘Alī Naẓīf ibn Yumn sur l’accord des chrétiens entre eux malgré leur désaccord dans l’expression // Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph. 1990. Vol. 51. P. 329–343.
24. Samir Kh. S. The Earliest Arab Apology for Christianity (c. 750) // Christian Arabic Apologetics During the Abbasid Period (750–1258) / ed. by Kh. S. Samir, J. Nielsen. Leiden; New York (N. Y.): Brill, 1994. (Numen Book Series; vol. 63). P. 57–114.
25. Treiger A. The Origins of Kalam // The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology / ed. by S. Schmidtke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. P. 29–43.
26. Treiger A. Greek into Arabic in Byzantine Antioch: ʿAbdallāh ibn al-Faḍl’s «Book of the Garden» (Kitāb ar-Rawḍa) // Ambassadors, Artists, Theologians: Byzantine Relations with the Near East from the Ninth to the Thirteenth Centuries / ed. by Z. Chitwood, J. Pahlitzsch. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 2019. (Byzanz zwischen Orient und Okzident; Bd. 12). P. 227–238.
27. Wannous R. A. Darlegung des Rechten Glaubens und Widerlegung der Irrtümer der Jakobiten und Nestorianer. Ein theologisch-polemisches Werk des mittelalterlichen christlichen arabischen Theologen ʿAbdallah Ibn al-Faḍl al-Anṭākī: in 2 Bde. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktortitels. Marburg: Philipps-Universität Marburg, 2011.
28. Wolfson H. The Muslim Attributes and the Christian Trinity // Harward Theological Review. 1956. Vol. 49 (1). P. 1–18.
Review
For citations:
Davydenkov a. Gerasimus, a Little-known Melkite Apologist. Bible and Christian Antiquity. 2025;(4):97-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2025.28.4.003
JATS XML




