Preview

Bible and Christian Antiquity

Advanced search

Micah 4, 1–7 – A Prophecy About the Return of the Jews from Babylon, and Not About the Church? Problems in the Exegesis of Prophetic Texts in Theodore of Mopsuestia

https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2024.24.4.004

Abstract

Theodore of Mopsuestia, for apologetic purposes in the 5th century, reexamined the traditional messianic interpretation of the prophetic texts of the Old Testament. The tools for this work were the fundamental principles of philological and historical analysis known at that time. The attempt to resolve the contradictions and problems in the area of messianic prophecy in the Old Testament led to a radical reduction of the messianic reading of most prophetic texts. A striking example of this is Micah 4, 1–7. Theodore’s commentary on this passage clearly shows his hermeneutical strategy, its strengths and weaknesses. When considering the interpreter’s arguments, it becomes obvious that the proponent of a precise literal interpretation of the Scriptures is forced to sacrifice the literal meaning of significant structures of the text in order to justify a narrow historical understanding of the prophetic text.

About the Author

Archpriest Boris Timofeev
Moscow Theological Academy
Russian Federation

Archpriest Boris Timofeev, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Biblical Studies

Academy, Holy Trinity-St. Sergius Lavra, Sergiev Posad 141300



References

1. Риболов С. Богословская методология Феодора Мопсуестийского // Труди Киïвськоï Духовноï Академiï. 2013. № 18. С. 169–184.

2. Blenkinsopp J. Ezra-Nehemiah: Commentary. Philadelphia (Pa.): Presbyterian Publishing Corporation, 1988. (The Old Testament Library).

3. Collins J. Ezra / ESV Study Bible // Bible Works 10. Copyright (c) 2015 Bible Works, LLC. Version 10.0.4.114. (Electronic edition).

4. Devreesse R. Essai sur Théodore de Mopsueste. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1948. (ST; vol. 141).

5. Ζαχαρόπουλος Δ. Θεόδωρος ὁ Μοπσουεστίας ὡς ἡρμηνευτὴς τῶν Γραφῶν. Ἀθήνα: Ἄρτος Ζωῆς, 1999.

6. Guinot J.-N. La cristallisation d’un différend: Zorobabel dans ľexégèse de Théodore de Mopsueste et de Théodoret de Cyr // Augustinianum. 1984. Vol. 24. P. 527–547.

7. Hill R. C. Theodore of Mopsuestia, Interpreter of The Prophets // Sacris erudiri. 2001. Vol. 40. P. 107–129.

8. Kofsky A., Ruser S. Theodore of Mopsuestia’s Hermeneutics: Transformed Theology in Response to Fourth Century Crises // Vox patrum. 2014. Vol. 34 (61). P. 221–238.

9. Mariès L. Études préliminaires a ľedition de Diodore de Tarse sur les Psaumes. Paris: Les Belles Letteres, 1933.

10. McLeod F. G. Theodore of Mopsuestia. London; New York (N. Y.): Routledge, 2009. (The Early Church Fathers).

11. Simonetti M. Lettera e/o Allegoria: un contributo alla storia dell’esegesi patristica. Roma: Institutum patristicum Augustinianum, 1985. (Studia ephemerides «Augustinianum»; vol. 23).

12. Simonetti M. Theodor of Mopsuestia // Handbook of Patristic Exegesis: The Bible in Ancient Christianity / by Ch. Kannengiesser with spec. contrib. of various scholars. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2006. (The Bible in Ancient Christianity; vol. 1). P. 799–828.

13. Schäublin C. Untersushungen zu Methode und Herkunft der Antiochenischen Exegese. Köln; Bonn: P. Hanstein Verlag, 1974. (Theophaneia; Bd. 23).


Review

For citations:


Timofeev A. Micah 4, 1–7 – A Prophecy About the Return of the Jews from Babylon, and Not About the Church? Problems in the Exegesis of Prophetic Texts in Theodore of Mopsuestia. Bible and Christian Antiquity. 2024;(4):107-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2024.24.4.004

Views: 41

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658−7815 (Print)
ISSN 2713-1122 (Online)