The New Subject of Historical Narrative in the «Ecclesiastical History» of Eusebius of Caesarea
https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2025.26.2.005
Abstract
This article is devoted to the question of the complex genre specificity of Eusebius of Caesarea’s «Ecclesiastical History». The complexity of genre identification of this work is due to the fact that it contains elements of various genres: panegyric and hagiography, apologia and polemics, literary history and biography. The aim of the article is to clarify the phenomenon of Ecclesiastical History. For this purpose, it seems necessary to consider this work within the framework of Greek historiographical tradition, as well as to trace the evolution of the historical genre, referring also to the works of Herodotus, Thucydides, Polybius, Josephus Flavius, which will allow us to identify in what Eusebius followed his predecessors, and in what he was unique. In building his argumentation, the author of the article resorts to comparative and comparative analysis, as well as the historical and philological method of research, which combines the study of the genre nature and plot and semantic organization of the text. The author concludes that the genre heterogeneity of the Ecclesiastical History is due, on the one hand, to the expansion of the historical sphere — beginning with Herodotus, each subsequent historian contributed something new to the historical narrative — and, on the other hand, to the extensive and diverse heritage of the first church historian, due to which elements of all the genres in which Eusebius wrote are found in his historical work.
About the Author
V. M. FranzhevRussian Federation
Victor M. Franzhev - PhD student at the Moscow Theological Academy, Lecturer at the at the SS. Cyril and Methodius School for Post-Graduate and Doctoral Studies
References
1. Ващева И. Ю. «Церковная история» Евсевия Кесарийского: терминология и проблемы этно-культурной идентичности на пороге средневековья // Проблемы истории, филологии, культуры. 2018. № 1. С. 169−183.
2. Кащеев В. И. Полибий и его «Прагматическая история» // Античный мир и археология: Межвуз. сб. науч. тр. Вып. 11. Саратов: Изд. Саратовского университета, 2002. С. 23–30.
3. Коллингвуд Р. Д. Идея истории. Автобиография. М.: Наука, 1980.
4. Морескини К., Норелли Э. История литературы раннего христианства на греческом и латинском языках. Т. 1: от ап. Павла до эпохи Константина. М.: Греко-латинский кабинет Ю. А. Шичалина, 2021.
5. Фролов Э. Д. Речи в «Истории» Фукидида, их художественное и теоретическое назначение // Мнемон: исследования и публикации по истории античного мира. Вып. 5 / под ред. Э. Д. Фролова. СПб.: СПбГУ, 2006. С. 137–144.
6. Carriker A. J. The Library of Eusebius of Caesarea. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2003. (Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae; vol. 67).
7. Crowford M. R. Ammonius of Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea and the Origins of Gospels Scholarship // New Testament Studies. 2015. Vol. 61. P. 1–29.
8. DeVore D. J. Genre and Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History: Toward a Focused Debate // Eusebius of Caesarea: Tradition and Innovations / ed. by A. Johnson, J. Schott. Cambridge (Mass.); London: Harvard University Press, 2013. P. 19–49.
9. DeVore D. J., Kennedy S. Eusebius’ Knowledge of Thucydides // Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies. 2023. Vol. 63 (1). P. 27–50.
10. Inowlocki S. Eusebius and the Jewish Authors: His Citation Technique in an Apologetic Context. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2006. (Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity; vol. 64).
11. Mendels D. The Media Revolution of Early Christianity: An Essay on Eusebius’s Ecclesiastical History. Cambridge; Grand Rapids (Mich.): Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1999.
12. Mendels D. The Source of the Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius: The Case of Josephus // L’historiographie de l’Église des premiers siècles / éd. par B. Pouderon et Y.-M. Duval. Paris: Beauchesne, 2001. (Théologie Historique; vol. 114). P. 195−205.
13. Muckensturm-Poulle C. Exégèse et Histoire sainte dans l’Histoire ecclésiastique d’Eusèbe de Césarée (Livre I) // Dialogues d’histoire ancienne. Supplément. 2010. № 4 (1). P. 141–153.
14. Overbeck F. Über die Anfange der Kirchengeschichtsschreibung. Basel: L. Reinhardt, 1892.
15. Schott J. M. Eusebius’ Panegyric on the Building of Churches (HE 10.4.2–72): Aesthetics and the Politics of Christian Architecture // Reconsidering Eusebius: Collected Papers on Literary, Historical, and Theological Issues / ed. by S. Inowlocki, C. Zamagni. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2011. (Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae; vol. 107). P. 177−197.
16. Schwartz E. Eusebios von Caesarea // Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der Klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler’sche Buchhandlung, 1907. Bd. 9. S. 1366–1439.
17. Verdoner M. Transgeneric Crosses: Apologetics in the Church History of Eusebius // Three Greek Apologists: Origen, Eusebius, and Athanasius / ed. by A.-Ch. Jacobsen and J. Ulrich. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang, 2007. (Early Christianity in the Context of Antiquity; vol. 3). P. 75–92.
Review
For citations:
Franzhev V.M. The New Subject of Historical Narrative in the «Ecclesiastical History» of Eusebius of Caesarea. Bible and Christian Antiquity. 2025;(2):151-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2025.26.2.005
JATS XML





