Heb. 7, 3: Argumentum ex silentio in the Light of Early Jewish Exegesis
https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2021.12.4.004
Abstract
The present article is dedicated to the exegetical argument based on silence or «argumentum ex silentio». In early Judaic hermeneutics a silence of the Scripture was regarded as the basis for a statement that a thing had never happened if it wasn’t mentioned. This method plays an important role in Hebrews argument on the superiority of Jesus’s priesthood over that of Levitical. At the same time, it isn’t quite clear for those who aren’t aware of early Judaic hermeneutics and needs a special consideration. In the following article I analyze some early Judaic exegetical texts (Midrash «Genesis Rabba», Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, Philo’s tract «On Flight and Finding» and Midrash «Tanchuma») using the argument based on silence in order to make a context of Heb. 7, 3 clearer. Thereafter the features of the argument of Heb. 7, 3 are examined in the light of rabbinical texts and Philo of Alexandria.
About the Author
E. Y. KolodniyRussian Federation
Eugene Y. Kolodniy, MA in Theology PhD student
17, Naberezhnaya Obvodnogo Kanala, Saint-Petersburg 191167
References
1. Вевюрко И. С. Септуагинта: древнегреческий текст Ветхого Завета в истории религиозной мысли. М.: МГУ, 2013. Лявданский А. К. Библия. IV. Переводы // ПЭ. М.: ЦНЦ «Православная энциклопедия», 2002. Т. 5. С. 120–200.
2. Никанор (Каменский), архиеп. Экзегетико-критическое исследование Святого Апостола Павла к Евреям. Казань: Тип. Императорского университета, 1903.
3. Attridge H. W. A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1989. Delitzsch F. Commentar zum Briefe an die Hebräer. Leipzig: Dörffling & Franke, 1857.
4. DeSilva D. Perseverance in Gratitude A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews. Grand Rapids: W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000. Ellingworth P. The Epistle to the Hebrews. A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids: W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1993.
5. Fitzmyer J. A. ‘Now This Melchizedek’ // Fitzmyer J. A. Essays of the Semitic Background of the New Testament. Missoula: Scholars Press, 1974. P. 221–243.
6. Hengel M. ‘Sit at My Right Hand’ // Hengel M. Studies in Early Christology. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1995. P. 119–225
7. Horton F. L. The Melchizedek Tradition. A Critical Examination of the Sources to the Fifth Century A. D. and in the Epistle to the Hebrews. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
8. Jastrow M. A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature. Vol. 2. London: Luzac & Co; New York: G. P. Putnams’s sons, 1903.
9. Jonge M., de, Woude A. S., van der. 11Q Melchizedek and New Testament Studies // New Testament Studies. 1966. Vol. 12 (4). P. 301–326.
10. Kobelski P. J. Melchizedek and Melchiresaʿ. Washington: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 1981.
11. Kulik A. Retroverting Slavonic Pseudepigrapha. Toward the Original of the Apocalypse of Abraham. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 2004. Lane W. L. Word Biblical Commentary. Vol. 47a. Hebrews 1–8. Dallas: Word, 2002.
12. Mason E. F. ‘You Are a Priest Forever’. Second Temple Jewish Messianism and the Priestly Christology of the Epistle to the Hebrews. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
13. Rosenfeld B. Torah Centers and Rabbinic Activity in Palistine 70–400 C. E. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
14. Segal M. H. A Grammar of Mishnaic Hebrew. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
15. Strack H. L., Billerbeck P. Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch. Bd. 3. München: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Oskar Beck, 1926.
16. Strack H. L., Stemberger G. Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996.
17. Trentham C. A. The Broadman Bible Commentary. Vol. 12. Hebrews. Nashville: Broadman Press, 1972. P. 1–99.
Review
For citations:
Kolodniy E.Y. Heb. 7, 3: Argumentum ex silentio in the Light of Early Jewish Exegesis. Bible and Christian Antiquity. 2021;(4):92-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2021.12.4.004
JATS XML





