“Anti-Palamism in Hans-Georg Beck’s Earlier Works: The Russian Origins and Some Catholic Parallels. Part I.”
https://doi.org/10.31802/2658-4476-2020-2-6-81-104
Abstract
Hans-Georg Beck (1910–1999), the most outstanding 20 th-century German Byzantinist, has gone a long way from a Benedictine monk to professor in Munich, a creator of a comprehensive conception of Byzantine general and cultural history. The problems of ecclesiastical history and theology were in the center of his scientific activity from its first steps on. As a student of Martin Grabmann, a prominent historian of Western scholasticism, Beck appropriated the Thomist view of theology. That is why he denied the real distinction between essence and energies in God, which had been disclosed and analyzed by Gregory Palamas. If in his first 1935 article, The Struggle for the Thomist Concept of Theology in Byzantium, Beck criticized Palamism «from outside», i. e., from the neoscholastic viewpoint, it was later then, in his secular thesis of 1952, that the German scholar tried to censure the Palamite doctrine «from inside» by making the case of its incompatibility with the Chalcedonian Orthodoxy.
About the Author
D. I. MakarovRussian Federation
Dmitry I. Makarov - Doctor of Philosophy, Professor at the Department of Bible and Theology; head of the Department of General Humanities
References
1. Balthasar H. U., von (1941) Kosmische Liturgie: Höhe und Krise des griechischen Weltbildes bei Maximus dem Bekenner. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.
2. Beck H. (1935) “Der Kampf um den thomistischen Theologiebegriff in Byzanz”. Divus Thomas, vol. 13, pp. 3–22.
3. Beck H.G. (1952) Theodoros Metochites. Die Krise des byzantinischen Weltbildes im 14. Jahr hundert. München: C. H. Beck.
4. Beck H. G. (1959) Kirche und theologische Literatur im byzantinischen Reich. München: C. H. Beck.
5. Beck P. H. (1937) Vorsehung und Vorherbestimmung in der theologischen Literatur der Byzantiner. Roma: Pontificio Istituto Orientale (Orientalia christiana analecta; 114).
6. Bergson A. (1994) Dva istochnika morali i religii [Two Sources of Morality and Religion], in A. B. Gofman (ed.). Moscow: Kanon+ (Istorija filosofii v pamjatnikah i dokumentah) (in Russian).
7. Brodskij I. (2000) “Puteshestvie v Stambul (1985)” [“Travel to Istanbul (1985)”], in Brodskij I. Poklonit’sja teni. Esse [Worship the Shadows. Essay]. SaintPetersburg: Azbuka, pp. 181– 228 (in Russian).
8. Candal E. (1945) Nilus Cabasilas et theologia S. Thomae de processione Spiritus Sancti. Città del Vaticano: Bibliotheca Apostolica Vaticana (Studi e testi; 116).
9. Candal M. (1959) “La Confesión de fe antipalamítica de Gregorio Acíndino”. Orientalia chris tiana periodica, vol. 25, pp. 215–264.
10. Candal M. (1963) “Escrito de Pálamas desconocido (Su ‘Confesión de fe’ refutada por Acíndino)”. Orientalia christiana periodica, vol. 29, pp. 357–440.
11. Chernoglazov D. A., Shufrin A. M., Benevich G. I. (eds.) (2019) Maksim Ispovednik, prp. Trudnosti k Fome (Ambigua ad Thomam); Trudnosti k Ioannu (Ambigua ad Iohannem) [St. Maxim the Confessor. Difficulties for Thomas (Ambigua ad Thomam); Difficulties for John (Ambigua ad Iohannem)]. Moscow: Eksmo (Vizantijskaja filosofija; 18. Smaragdos Philocalias) (in Russian).
12. Demetracopoulos J. A. (2011) “Palamas Transformed. Palamite Interpretations of the Distinction Between God’s ‘Essence’ and ‘Energies’ in Late Byzantium”, in M. Hinterberger and Ch. Schabel (eds.) Greeks, Latins and Intellectual History, 1204–1500. Leuven; Paris; Walpole (Mass.): Peeters (Recherches de théologie et philosophie médievales. Bibliotheca; 11), pp. 263–372.
13. Dzhojs Dzh. (2011) “Geroj Stiven” [“Hero Steven”], in S. S. Horuzhij (ed.) Dzhojs Dzh. Sobranie rannej prozy [Joyce J. A Collection of Early Prose]. Moscow: Eksmo (Biblioteka vsemirnoj literatury), pp. 37–272 (in Russian).
14. Gunnarsson H. (2002) Mystical Realism in the Early Theology of Gregory Palamas. Context and Analysis. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet (Skrifter utgivna vid Institutionen för religionsvetenskap. Göteborgs universitet; 28).
15. Hausherr I. (2007) “O duhovnosti isihazma: Spor bez protivnika” [“On the Spirituality of He sychasm: A Dispute without an Adversary”]. Simvol [Symbol], no. 52, pp. 307–322 (in Russian).
16. Horuzhij S. S. (1997) “Vladimir Solov’jov i mistikoasketicheskaja tradicija Pravoslavija” [“Vladimir Solovyov and the Mystical Ascetic Tradition of Orthodoxy”]. Theological Studies, issue 33, pp. 233–245 (in Russian).
17. Hunger H. (1953) “Besprechung von: Beck H.-G. Theodoros Metochites: Die Krise des byzan tinischen Weltbildes im 14. Jahrhundert”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift, vol. 46, pp. 123–127.
18. Hunger H. (1973) “Byzanz im europäischen Geschichtsdenken des 20. Jahrhunderts”, in Hunger H. Byzantinistische Grundlagenforschung. Gesammelte Aufsätze. London: Variorum reprints, pp. 49–60.
19. Kappes Ch. W. (2014) The Immaculate Conception. Why Thomas Aquinas Denied, While John Duns Scotus, Gregory Palamas, & Mark Eugenicus Professed the Absolute Immaculate Existence of Mary. New Bedford (Mass.): Academy of the Immaculate (Mariological Studies in Honor of Our Lady of Guadalupe; 2).
20. Kern K. (1996) Antropologija sv. Grigorija Palamy [Anthropology of St. Gregory Palamas]. Moscow: Palomnik (Svjatye Otcy i uchiteli Cerkvi v issledovanijah pravoslavnyh uch jonyh) (in Russian).
21. Kolbaba T. (2017) “Theological Debates with the West, 1054–1300”, in A. Kaldellis, N. Sinni os sog lou (eds.) The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 479–493.
22. Krivoshein V. (1996) “Asketicheskoe i bogoslovskoe uchenie sv. Grigorija Palamy” [“The Ascetic and Theological Teachings of St. Gregory Palamas”], in Krivoshein V. Bogoslovskie trudy 1952–1983 gg. Stat’i. Doklady. Perevody [Theological Studies of 1952–1983. Articles. Reports. Translations]. Nizhny Novgorod: Bratstvo vo imja sv. knjazja Aleksandra Nevskogo, pp. 114–208 (in Russian).
23. Legeev M. (2019) Bogoslovie istorii v Pravoslavnoj Cerkvi kak nauchnoe napravlenie: predposylki i perspectivy razvitija [Theology of History in the Orthodox Church as a Scientific Direction: Prerequisites and Development Prospects]. PhD Thesis in Theology. Moscow: OCAD (in Russian).
24. Ljubarskij Ja. N. (1999) Vizantijskie istoriki i pisateli [Byzantine Historians and Writers]. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia (Vizantijskaja biblioteka) (in Russian).
25. Ljubarskij Ja. N. (2005) Nikita Honiat i ego vremja [Nikita Choniat and His Time]. Saint Petersburg: Dmitrij Bulanin (in Russian).
26. Makarov D. I. (2020) “Koncept chastnoj sushchnosti v epohu dogmaticheskih sporov i v pozd nevizantijskoj mysli” [“The Concept of a Private Entity in the Era of Dogmatic Debate and in the Late Byzantine Thought”], in D. S. Biriukov, V. M. Lourié Logika i ontologija v vizantijskoj dogmaticheskoj polemike. Ocherki [Logic and Ontology in Byzantine Dogmatic Controversy. Essays]. SaintPetersburg: Centr sodejstvija obrazovaniju, pp. 159–168 (in Russian).
27. Makarov D. I. (2020, in Press) “Triptih o Romane Jakobsone” [“Triptych on Roman Jacobson”]. Veche. Journal of Russian Philosophy and Culture. SaintPetersburg (in Russian).
28. Makarov D. I., Polemis Ja. (eds.) (2020) Feodor Metohit. Slovo o nravstvennyh problemah, ili Ob obrazovannosti [Theodore Metohit. A Word About Moral Problems, or About Education]. SaintPetersburg: Dmitrij Bulanin (Paradeigmata byzantina; 1) (in Russian).
29. Marchenko O. V. (2013) “O Vladimire Erne, sofiologii i neopatristicheskom sinteze” [“About Vladimir Ern, Sophiology and Neopatristic Synthesis”], in K. M. Antonov, N. A. Vaganova Sofiologija i neopatristicheskij sintez: bogoslovskie itogi filosofskogo razvitija. Sbornik nauchnyh statej [Sophiology and Neopatristic Synthesis: The Theological Results of Philosophical Development. Compendium of Scientific Articles]. Moscow: PSTGU, pp. 33–43 (in Russian).
30. Medvedev I. P. (1997) Vizantijskij gumanizm XIV–XV vv. [Byzantine Humanism XIV–XV Centuries]. SaintPetersburg: Aletheia (Vizantijskaja biblioteka) (in Russian).
31. Nölle W. (1954) “Hesychasmus und Yoga”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift, vol. 47/1, pp. 95–103.
32. Podskalsky G. (1977) Theologie und Philosophie in Byzanz. Der Streit um die theologische Methodik in der spätbyzantinischen Geistesgeschichte (14./15. Jahrhunderts), seine systematischen Grundlagen und seine historische Entwicklung. München: C. H. Beck (Byzantinisches Archiv; 15).
33. Podskalsky G. (2003) Von Photios zu Bessarion. Der Vorrang humanistisch geprägter Theologie in Byzanz und deren bleibende Bedeutung. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag (Schriften zur Geistesgeschichte des östlichen Europa; 25).
34. Polemis I. D. (1996) Theophanes of Nicaea: His Life and Works. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Wiener byzantinische Studien; 20).
35. Schreiner P. (1999) “Nachruf: HansGeorg Beck (18.2.1910–25.5.1999)”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift, vol. 92/2, pp. 812–816.
36. Shevchenko I. I. (2001) “Vosprijatie Vizantii” [“Perception of Byzantium”], in D. Ja. Jalamas (ed.) MOSCHOBIA. Problemy vizantijskoj i novogrecheskoj filologii. K 60-letiju B. L. Fonkicha [ΜΟΣΧΟΒΙΑ. Problems of Byzantine and Modern Greek Philology. To the 60th Anniversary of B. L. Fonkich]. Moskow: Indrik, pp. 481–494 (in Russian).
37. Tinnefeld F. (1994) “Ein Text des Prochoros Kydones im Vat. gr. 609 über die Bedeutung der Syllogismen für die theologische Erkenntnis”, in A. Schoors, P. Van Deun (eds.) Philohistôr. Miscellanea in honorem Caroli Laga septuagenarii. Leuven: Peeters (Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta; 60), pp. 515–527.
38. Trubeckoj N. S. (1995) “Vorlesungen über die altrussische Literatur. Einleitung”, in N. I. Tol stoj, L. N. Gumiljev, V. M. Zhivov (eds.) Trubeckoj N. S. Istorija. Kul’tura. Jazyk [Trubet skoy N. S. History. The Culture. Language]. Moscow: ProgressUnivers (Filologi mira), pp. 469–543 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Makarov D.I. “Anti-Palamism in Hans-Georg Beck’s Earlier Works: The Russian Origins and Some Catholic Parallels. Part I.”. Bible and Christian Antiquity. 2020;(2):81-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31802/2658-4476-2020-2-6-81-104
JATS XML





