Preview

Bible and Christian Antiquity

Advanced search

The Problem of Interpreting the Figure of Melchizedek in Philo of Alexandria (De congressu eruditionis gratia 99)

https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2025.27.3.006

Abstract

The present article is dedicated to the investigation of the problem of the interpretation of Melchizedek’s figure in Philo’s of Alexandria fragment (De congressu eruditionis gratia 99). There are three approaches of its interpretation. According to the most popular of them Melchizedek’s is to be understood as an allegory of divine Logos. In agreement with another approach Melchizedek has to be treated literally, i.e. as a historical figure. Based on the third way of interpretation Melchizedek is an allegory of a human rational principle. In the article I argue why the first two approaches are to be rejected and demonstrate the consistency of the third approach. The last one is also elaborated in the light of Philo’s parallel fragments. 

About the Author

Eugene Yu. Kolodniy
St. Tikhon’s Orthodox Humanitarian University
Russian Federation

Eugene Y. Kolodniy, MA in Theology, Faculty member at the Department of Theology,

6, bld. 1, Likhov lane, Moscow 127051.



References

1. Колодный Е. Ю. Послание к Евреям 7, 3: argumentum ex silentio в контексте ранней иудейской экзегезы // Библия и христианская древность. 2021. № 4 (12). С. 92–110.

2. Колодный Е. Ю. Был ли Мелхиседек божественным Логосом в трактовке Филона Александрийского (Legum allegoriae III 79‒82)? // Библия и христианская древность. 2024. № 3 (23). С. 140–162.

3. Сомов А. Б. Образ Мелхиседека в Послании к Евреям и в иудейских текстах периода Второго храма // Вестник Свято-Филаретовского института. 2020. Вып. 36. С. 209‒229.

4. Davila J. R. Liturgical Works. Grand Rapids (Mich.); Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2000.

5. Gfrörer A. F. Philo und die alexandrinische Theosophie, oder vom Einflusse der jüdischägyptischen Schule auf die Lehre des neuen Testaments: in 2 Bd. Bd. 1. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart’s Verlagshandlung, 1831.

6. Goodenogh E. R. By Light, Light, The Mystic Gospel of Hellenistic Judaism. Amsterdam: Philo Press Publishers, 1969.

7. Grotius H. Annotationum in Novum Testamentum: in 3 t. T. 2. Parisiis: Apud vid. G. Pele et I. Duval, 1646.

8. Horton F. L. The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources to the Fifth Century A.D. and in the Epistle to the Hebrews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

9. Leisegang H. Der Heilige Geist. Das Wesen und Werden der Mystisch-Intuitiven Erkenntnis in der Philosophie und Religion der Griechen. Bd. 1/1: Die vorchristlichen Anschauungen und Lehren von Πνεῦµα und der mystisch-intuitiven Erkenntnis. Leipzig; Berlin: Verlag und Druck von B. G. Teubner, 1919.

10. Longenecker R. The Melchizedek Argument of Hebrews: A Study in the Development and Circumstantial Expression of the New Testament Thought // Unity and Diversity in New Testament Theology: Essays in Honor of George E. Ladd / ed. by G. Eldon. Grand Rapids (Mich.): Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1978. P. 161‒185.

11. Mason E. F. ‘You Are a Priest Forever’: Second Temple Jewish Messianism and the Priestly Christology of the Epistle to the Hebrews. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2008. (Studies on the Text of the Desert of Judah; vol. 74).

12. Siegfried C. Philo von Alexandria als Ausleger des Alten Testaments. An sich selbst und seinem Geschichtlichen Einfluss betrachtet. Nebst Untersuchung über die Graecitaet Philo’s. Jena: Verlag von Hermann Dufft, 1875.

13. Winston D., Dillon J. Two Treatises of Philo of Alexandria: A Commentary on De Gigantibus and Quod Deus sit Immutabilis. Chico (Calif.): Scholars Press, 2020.

14. Wuttke G. Melchisedech der Priesterkönig von Salem. Eine Studie zur Geschichte der Exegese. Gießen: Verlag von Alfred Töpelmann, 1927. (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft; Bd. 5).


Review

For citations:


Kolodniy E.Yu. The Problem of Interpreting the Figure of Melchizedek in Philo of Alexandria (De congressu eruditionis gratia 99). Bible and Christian Antiquity. 2025;(3):149-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31802/BCA.2025.27.3.006

Views: 32

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658−7815 (Print)
ISSN 2713-1122 (Online)