patristicБиблия и христианская древностьBible and Christian Antiquity2658−78152713-1122Московская духовная академия10.31802/BCA.2025.26.2.010patristic-89Research ArticleРЕЦЕНЗИИREVIEWSРецензия на: The Aramaic Books of Enoch and Related Literature from Qumran: Proceedings of the International Online Conference Organized by the Center for the Study of Second Temple Judaism of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, in Cooperation with Enoch Seminar, 20–22 October 2020 / ed. by H. Drawnel. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2024. (Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism; vol. 216). XVIII, 317 p. ISBN 978-90-04-69670-9Review of: The Aramaic Books of Enoch and Related Literature from Qumran: Proceedings of the International Online Conference Organized by the Center for the Study of Second Temple Judaism of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, in Cooperation with Enoch Seminar, 20–22 October 2020 / ed. by H. Drawnel. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2024. (Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism; vol. 216). XVIII, 317 p. ISBN 978-90-04-69670-9КропиновЕ. А.KropinovE. A.
Егор Алексеевич Кропинов
Egor A. Kropinov
20251102202602238245Copyright © Кропинов Е.А., 20262026Кропинов Е.А.Kropinov E.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.patristic.ru/jour/article/view/89
.
.
ReferencesАлиева О. В. Delta Берроуза для древнегреческих авторов: опыт применения // ΣΧΟΛΗ. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция. 2022. Т. 16 (2). С. 693–705.Алиева О. В. Delta Берроуза для древнегреческих авторов: опыт применения // ΣΧΟΛΗ. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция. 2022. Т. 16 (2). С. 693–705.Алиева О. В. Опыт измерения стилистической однородности методом Delta на материале Платоновского корпуса // Аристей: Вестник классической филологии и античной истории. 2022. Т. 25. С. 19–37.Алиева О. В. Опыт измерения стилистической однородности методом Delta на материале Платоновского корпуса // Аристей: Вестник классической филологии и античной истории. 2022. Т. 25. С. 19–37.Neugebauer O. From Assyriology to Renaissance Art // Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1989. Vol. 133. P. 391–403.Neugebauer O. From Assyriology to Renaissance Art // Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1989. Vol. 133. P. 391–403.Reed A. Y. Categorization, Collection, and the Construction of Continuity: 1 Enoch and 3 Enoch in and Beyond «Apocalypticism» and «Mysticism» // Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. 2017. Vol. 29. P. 268–311.Reed A. Y. Categorization, Collection, and the Construction of Continuity: 1 Enoch and 3 Enoch in and Beyond «Apocalypticism» and «Mysticism» // Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. 2017. Vol. 29. P. 268–311.Schäfer P. Tradition and Redaction in Hekhalot Literature // Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period. 1983. Vol. 14 (2). P. 172—181.Schäfer P. Tradition and Redaction in Hekhalot Literature // Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period. 1983. Vol. 14 (2). P. 172—181.Stern S. Calendars in Antiquity: Empires, States, and Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Stern S. Calendars in Antiquity: Empires, States, and Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Stuckenbruck L. T. The Book of Enoch: Why the Aramaic Scrolls Matter [Draft] // Academia. edu. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.academia.edu/109086576/The_Book_of_Enoch_Why_the_Aramaic_Scrolls_Matter_1_at_Loren_T_Stuckenbruck_LMU_Munich (дата обращения 27.04.2025).Stuckenbruck L. T. The Book of Enoch: Why the Aramaic Scrolls Matter [Draft] // Academia. edu. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.academia.edu/109086576/The_Book_of_Enoch_Why_the_Aramaic_Scrolls_Matter_1_at_Loren_T_Stuckenbruck_LMU_Munich (дата обращения 27.04.2025).Synopse zur Hekhalot-Literatur / hrsg. von P. Schäfer und H. G. von Mutius. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1981. (Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum; Bd. 2).Synopse zur Hekhalot-Literatur / hrsg. von P. Schäfer und H. G. von Mutius. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1981. (Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum; Bd. 2).
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.