patristicБиблия и христианская древностьBible and Christian Antiquity2658−78152713-1122Московская духовная академия10.31802/2658-4476-2020-1-5-135-162patristic-267Research ArticleПЕРЕВОДЫ, ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ И КОММЕНТАРИИ. Псевдоэпиграфы и литература Второго храмаTRANSLATIONS, RESEARCH AND COMMENTS. Pseudepigraphs and literature of the Second templeРелигиозная мотивация создания ветхозаветных псевдоэпиграфовReligious Motives of the Creation of Old Testament PseudepigraphaВевюркоИ. С.VeviurkoI. S.

Илья Сергеевич Вевюрко - кандидат философских наук, старший преподаватель

119234, Москва, Ленинские горы, МГУ, учебно-научный корпус «Шуваловский», философский факультет 

Ilia S. Veviurko - PhD in Philosophy, Senior Teacher at the Department of Philosophy of Religion and Religion Studies

Leninskie Gory, Lomonosov Moscow State Univerity, Shuvalovsky Building, Department of Philosophy, Moscow 119234

vevurka@mail.ruМГУ им. М. В. ЛомоносоваMoscow State Univerity20200203202651135162Copyright © Вевюрко И.С., 20262026Вевюрко И.С.Veviurko I.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.patristic.ru/jour/article/view/267

В статье исследуется гипотетическое отношение авторов псевдоэпиграфов, как носителей религиозного сознания, к их собственному творчеству. Для этого выявляется специфика псевдоэпиграфа как особого типа текста, а также рассматриваются различные виды литературного творчества и его мотивации, с тем чтобы выявить наиболее релевантные мотивы. Также предпринимается обзор и критика существующих гипотез природы псевдонимии в парабиблейской литературе, включая концепции, касающиеся предпосылок и условий создания «переписанной Библии». Выясняются причины, по которым, отличаясь и от канонического текста, и от литературной фикции, но представляя собой то, что сами его создатели считают записью откровения, псевдоэпиграф не мог не быть псевдонимичным по условиям литературного процесса эпохи, его породившей. В конце статьи сделаны выводы о природе отношения псевдоэпиграфического корпуса текстов к каноническому.

There is explored in the article a hypothetical attitude of the authors of pseudepigrapha, given that they had a religious consciousness, to their literary work. For such a purpose there is revealed a specifity of pseudepigraph as a special type of text, and different types of literary creativity and its motivation are examined in order to identify the most relevant motives. There is also undertaken the review and criticism of existing hypotheses of the nature of the pseudonymity in parabiblical literature, including concepts relating to the background and conditions for the creation of a «rewritten Bible». There are clarified the reasons for which pseudepigraph, differing from both the canonical text and the literary fiction, but representing what its creators themselves consider to be a record of revelation, could not but be pseudonymous in conditions of the literary process of the era that gave rise to it. At the end of the article, conclusions are drawn about the nature of relation between the pseudepigraphic corpus of texts and the canonical one.

Ветхий Заветпереписанная БиблияпсевдоэпиграфыапокрифыOld Testamentrewritten BiblepseudepigraphaapocryphaReferencesБадаланова Г. Ф. Книга сущая в устах: Фольклорная Библия бессарабских и таврических болгар. М.: Университет Дмитрия Пожарского, 2017.Arzhanov Ju. N. (ed.) (2011) Sirijskie vethozavetnye psevdoepigrafy [Syrian Old Testament Pseudo-Epigraphs]. Saint-Petersburg: Dmitrij Bulanin (in Russian).Брагинская Н. В. «Иосиф и Асенет»: «Мидраш» до мидраша и «роман» до романа //Вестник древней истории. 2005. № 3. С. 73–96; 2007. № 1. C. 32–75.Badalanova G. F. (2017) Kniga sushchaja v ustah: Fol’klornaja Biblija bessarabskih itavricheskih bolgar [A Book Existing on Lips: Folklore Bible of Bessarabian and Tauride Bulgarians]. Moscow: Universitet Dmitrija Pozharskogo (in Russian).Виноградов А. Ю., Дунаев А. Г. Ерма // ПЭ. М.: ЦНЦ «Православная энциклопедия», 2008. Т. 18. С. 612–620.Belova O. V. (ed.) (2004) ‘Narodnaja Biblija’: Vostochnoslavjanskie etiologicheskie legendy [‘The People’s Bible’: East Slavic Etiological Legends]. Moscow: Indrik (in Russian).Дройзен И. Г. Историка. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2004.Braginskaja N. V. (2005, 2007) “‘Iosif i Asenet’: ‘Midrash’ do midrasha i ‘roman’ do romana” [“‘Joseph and Asenet’: ‘Midrash’ to Midrash and ‘Novel’ to Novel”]. Vestnik drevnej istorii, no. 3, pp. 73–96, no. 1, pp. 32–75 (in Russian).Кугел Дж. В доме Потифара. Библейский текст и его перевоплощение / пер. с англ. М. Вогмана. М.: Книжники, 2010.Bregman M. (1999) “Pseudepigraphy in Rabbinic Literature”, in E. G. Chazon, M. Stone (eds.) Pseudepigraphic Perspectives: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Leiden: Brill, pp. 27–42.Кулишова О. В. Дельфийский оракул в системе античных межгосударственных отношений. СПб.: Гуманитарная Академия, 2001.Brooke G. (2000) “Rewritten Bible”. Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Oxford: University Press, vol. 2, pp. 777–781.Мандеи: История, литература, религия. СПб.: Летний сад, 2002.Capps E. (ed.) (1926) Josephus. London: William Heinemann, vol. 1.Мартынов В. И. Конец времени композиторов. Коломна: Музей Орга нической Культуры, 2016.Dimant D. (2014) History, Ideology and Bible Interpretation in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Мифологии древнего мира / ред. В. А. Якобсона. М.: Наука, 1977.Drojzen I. G. (2004) Istorika [Historical]. Saint-Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ (in Russian).«Народная Библия»: Восточнославянские этиологические легенды / сост. и комм. О. В. Беловой. М: Индрик, 2004.Fajer V. V. (2013) Rozhdenie filologii. ‘Iliada’ v Aleksandrijskoj biblioteke [Creation of Philology. The ‘Iliad’ at the Alexandrian Library]. Moscow: Universitet Dmitrija Pozharskogo (in Russian).Тантлевский И. Р. Иудейские псевдоэпиграфы мистико-гностического толка. СПб: РХГА, 2014.Hezser C. (2018) Bild und Kontext. Jüdische und christliche Ikonographie der Spätantike. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Тертуллиан. Избранные сочинения / ред. А. А. Столярова. М.: Прогресс, 1994.Himmelfarb M. (2006) A Kingdom of Priests: Ancestry and Merit in Ancient Judaism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Файер В. В. Рождение филологии. «Илиада» в Александрийской библиотеке. М.: Университет Дмитрия Пожарского, 2013.Jackson D. (2009) “Jubilees and Enochic Judaism”, in G. Boccaccini, G. Ibba (eds.) Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, pp. 411–425.Bregman M. Pseudepigraphy in Rabbinic Literature // Pseudepigraphic Perspectives: The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls / ed. by E. G. Chazon, M. Stone. Leiden: Brill, 1999. Р. 27–42.Jakobson V. A. (ed.) (1977) Mifologija drevnego mira [Mythologies of the Ancient World]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).Brooke G. Rewritten Bible // Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Oxford: University Press, 2000. Vol. 2. Р. 777–781.Jassen A. (2007) Mediating the Divine: Prophecy and Revelation in the Dead Sea Scrolls andDimant D. History, Ideology and Bible Interpretation in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Second Temple Judaism. Leiden: Brill.Hezser C. Bild und Kontext. Jüdische und christliche Ikonographie der Spätantike. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.Joosten J. (2018) “Late Biblical Hebrew and Qumran Hebrew — a Diachronic View”, in J. Joosten (ed.) The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period. Leiden: Brill, pp. 93–103.Himmelfarb M. A Kingdom of Priests: Ancestry and Merit in Ancient Judaism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.Knavig H. (2009) “Enochic Judaism — a Judaism Without the Torah and the Temple?”, in G. Boccaccini, G. Ibba (eds.) Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, pp. 163–177.Jackson D. Jubilees and Enochic Judaism // Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees / ed. by G. Boccaccini, G. Ibba. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009. Р. 411–425.Kugel J. (2010) V dome Potifara. Biblejskij tekst i ego perevoploshchenie [In the House of Potiphar. Biblical Text and Its Transformation], in M. Vogman (ed.). Moscow: Knizhniki (in Russian).Jassen A. Mediating the Divine: Prophecy and Revelation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Second Temple Judaism. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Kulik A. (2010) 3 Baruch: Greek-Slavonic Apocalypse of Baruch. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.Joosten J. Late Biblical Hebrew and Qumran Hebrew — a Diachronic View // The Reconfiguration of Hebrew in the Hellenistic Period / ed. by J. Joosten et al. Leiden: Brill, 2018. P. 93–103.Kulishova O. V. (2001) Del’fijskij orakul v sisteme antichnyh mezhgosudarstvennyh otnoshenij [Delphic Oracle in the System of Ancient Intergovernmental Relations]. Saint-Petersburg: Gumanitarnaja Akademija (in Russian).Knavig H. Enochic Judaism — a Judaism Without the Torah and the Temple? // Enoch and theMartynov V. I. (2016) Konec vremeni kompozitorov [End Time Composers]. Kolomna: Muzej Organicheskoj Kul’tury (in Russian).Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees / ed. by G. Boccaccini, G. Ibba. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009. P. 163–177.Mroczek E. (2016) The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Kulik A. 3 Baruch: Greek-Slavonic Apocalypse of Baruch. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 2010.Murphy F. J. (1993) Pseudo-Philo: Rewriting the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Mroczek E. The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Najman H. (2009) “Reconsidering Jubilees: Prophecy and Exemplarity”, in G. Boccaccini, G. Ibba (eds.) Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, pp. 229–243.Murphy F. J. Pseudo-Philo: Rewriting the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Petersen A. (2014) “Textual Fidelity, Elaboration, Supersession or Encroachment?”, in J. Zsengellér (ed.) Rewritten Bible After Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? Leiden: Brill, pp. 13–48.Najman H. Reconsidering Jubilees: Prophecy and Exemplarity // Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees / ed. by G. Boccaccini, G. Ibba. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009. P. 229–243.Reed A. Y. (2015) “Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and Post-70 Judaism”, in S. C. Mimouni (ed.) Les Judaïsmes dans tous leurs etats aux I–III siecles. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 117–148.Petersen A. Textual Fidelity, Elaboration, Supersession or Encroachment? // Rewritten Bible After Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? / ed. by J. Zsengellér. Leiden: Brill, 2014. P. 13–48.Sanders E. P. (1992) Judaism: Practice and Belief 63 BCE — 66 CE. London: SCM.Reed A. Y. Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and Post-70 Judaism // Les Judaïsmes dans tousleurs etats aux I–III siecles / ed. by S. C. Mimouni et al. Turnhout: Brepols, 2015. P. 117–148.Schubert K. (1992) “Jewish Influence on Earliest Christian Painting: The Via Latina Catacomb” in Schreckenberg H., Schubert K. Jewish Historiography and Iconography in Early and Medieval Christianity. Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 189–210.Sanders E. P. Judaism: Practice and Belief 63 BCE — 66 CE. London: SCM, 1992.Segal M. (2005) “Between Bible and Rewritten Bible”, in M. Henze (ed.) Biblical Interpretation at Qumran. Grand Rapids; Cambridge: Eerdmans, pp. 10–28.Schubert K. Jewish Influence on Earliest Christian Painting: The Via Latina Catacomb // Schreckenberg H., Schubert K. Jewish Historiography and Iconography in Early and Medieval Christianity. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1992. P. 189–210.Segal M. (ed.) (2007) The Book of Jubilees: Rewritten Bible, Redaction, Ideology and Theology. Leiden: Brill.Segal M. (2018) “Harmonization and Rewriting of Daniel 6 from the Bible to Qumran”, in B. Y. Goldstein (ed.) Hā-ʾîsh Mōshe: Studies in Scriptural Interpretation in the Dead SeaSegal M. Between Bible and Rewritten Bible // Biblical Interpretation at Qumran / ed. by M. Henze. Grand Rapids; Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2005. P. 10–28.Scrolls and Related Literature in Honor of Moshe J. Bernstein. Leiden: Brill, pp. 265–279.Segal M. Harmonization and Rewriting of Daniel 6 from the Bible to Qumran // Hā-ʾîsh Mōshe: Studies in Scriptural Interpretation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature in Honor of Moshe J. Bernstein / ed. by B. Y. Goldstein et al. Leiden: Brill, 2018. P. 265–279.Sheinfeld Sh. (2013) “The Pseudepigrapha in Current Research”. Religion Compass, vol. 7 (5), pp. 1–8.Sheinfeld Sh. The Pseudepigrapha in Current Research // Religion Compass. 2013. Vol. 7 (5). P. 1–8.Shemesh A. (2009) “4Q265 and the Authoritative Status of Jubilees at Qumran”, in G. Boccaccini, G. Ibba (eds.) Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, pp. 247–260.Shemesh A. 4Q265 and the Authoritative Status of Jubilees at Qumran // Enoch and the Mosaic Torah: The Evidence of Jubilees / ed. by G. Boccaccini, G. Ibba. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009. Р. 247–260.Shiffman L. (2004) “Pseudepigrapha in the Pseudepigrapha: Mythical Books in Second Temple Literature”. Revue de Qumrân, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 429–438.Shiffman L. Pseudepigrapha in the Pseudepigrapha: Mythical Books in Second Temple Literature // Revue de Qumrân. 2004. Vol. 21. № 3. P. 429–438.Stoljarov A. A. (ed.) (1994) Tertullian. Izbrannye sochinenija [Tertullian. Selected Works]. Moscow: Progress (in Russian).The Book of Jubilees: Rewritten Bible, Redaction, Ideology and Theology / ed. by M. Segal. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Tantlevskij I. R. (2014) Iudejskie psevdoepigrafy mistiko-gnosticheskogo tolka [Mystic-Gnostic Judaic Pseudo-Epigraphs]. Saint-Petersburg: RHGA (in Russian).Vermes G. The Genesis of the Concept of «Rewritten Bible» // Rewritten Bible After Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? / ed. by J. Zsengellér. Leiden: Brill, 2014. P. 3–9.Vermes G. (2014) “The Genesis of the Concept of ‘Rewritten Bible’”, in J. Zsengellér (ed.) Rewritten Bible After Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? Leiden: Brill, pp. 3–9.Wills L. M. The Jewish Novel in the Ancient World. New York: Cornell University Press, 1995.Veviurko I. S. (ed.) (2017) Paralipomeny Ieremii proroka (Chetvjertaja kniga Varuha)[Chronicles of Jeremiah the Prophet (Fourth Book of Baruch)]. Moscow: Universitet Dmitrija Pozharskogo (in Russian).Vinogradov A. Ju., Dunaev A. G. (2008) “Herma” [“Hermas”]. Pravoslavnaja enciklopedija, vol. 18, pp. 612–620 (in Russian).Vinogradov A. Ju., Dunaev A. G. (2008) “Herma” [“Hermas”]. Pravoslavnaja enciklopedija, vol. 18, pp. 612–620 (in Russian).Wills L. M. (1995) The Jewish Novel in the Ancient World. New York: Cornell University Press.Wills L. M. (1995) The Jewish Novel in the Ancient World. New York: Cornell University Press.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.