patristicБиблия и христианская древностьBible and Christian Antiquity2658−78152713-1122Московская духовная академия10.31802/BCA.2021.11.3.003patristic-149Research ArticleКРИТИЧЕСКИЕ ИЗД АНИЯ, РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ ТЕКСТОВ, ПЕРЕВОДЫ И КОММЕНТАРИИCRITICAL EDITIONS, RECONS TRUCTION OF TEXTS, TRANSL ATIONS AND COMMENTSК вопросу о медицинской библиотеке свт. Фотия КонстантинопольскогоAbout the Medical Library of St. Photius of ConstantinopleПролыгинаИ. В.ProlyginaI. V.

Irina V. Prolygina - PhD in Philology, head of the Department of Latin Language and Basic Terminology at the Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry.

Delegatskaya, 20/1, Moscow 127473

prolygina99@yandex.ruМГМСУ им. А.И. ЕвдокимоваРоссияMoscow State University of Medicine and DentistryRussian Federation20212702202603125139Copyright © Пролыгина И.В., 20262026Пролыгина И.В.Prolygina I.V.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.patristic.ru/jour/article/view/149

В статье рассматривается 322 трактат «Амфилохий» свт. Фотия Константинопольского, посвящённый медицинским вопросам, и ставится вопрос о его возможных источниках и медицинской библиотеке, доступной патриарху в Константинополе. Композиционно в амфилохии вычленяются четыре отрывка разной тематики, заимствованные в сжатой форме из позднеантичной медицинской литературы. В качестве источников патриарх преимущественно использовал тексты, упомянутые им в «Библиотеке». Способы компиляции текстов свидетельствуют не только о прекрасном знании предшествующей медицинской традиции, но и о критическом осмыслении источников и стремлении к обобщению разных взглядов. Впервые публикуется русский перевод 322-й амфилохии.

This paper discusses the treatise 322 of St. Photius’ «Amphilochia» dedicated to some medical questions and raises the question of its possible sources and the medical library available to the patriarch in Constantinople. In its composition there can be discerned four fragments of different topics borrowed from the Late Ancient medical literature. The texts used by Photius in this treatise as his sources, are mostly those of his «Bibliotheca». The methods he applied to combine different texts together, give sufficient evidence that Photius not only was very well acquainted with Ancient medical tradition, but also considered his sources critically, making attempts to summarize different opinions. Russian translation of this treatise is attached.

византийская медицинамедицинские книгибиблиотекавизантийская филологиясвт. Фотий КонстантинопольскийByzantine medicineMedical booksLibraryByzantine philologyPhotius of ConstantinopleReferencesBouras-Vallianatos P. Galen in Late Antique Medical Handbooks // Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Galen / ed. P. Bouras-Vallianatos, B. Zipser. Leiden: Brill, 2019. P. 38–61.Afinogenov D. E. (ed.) (2002) Fotij, patriarch, svt. Izbrannye traktaty iz ‘Amfilohij’ [St. Photius. Selected Treatises from ‘Amphilochius’]. Moscow: Indrik (in Russian).Canfora L. Il «Reading сircle» intorno a Fozio // Byzantion. 1998. Vol. 68. P. 222–223.Afinogenov D. E. (ed.) (2019) “Fotij Konstantinopol’skij, svt. Amfilohii. Traktat 1” [“St. Photius of Constantinople. Amphilochia. Treatise 1”]. Bible and Christian Antiquity, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 78–108 (in Russian).Cavallo G. Lire à Byzance. Paris: Les Belles lettres, 2006.Afinogenov D. E. (ed.) (2019) “Fotij Konstantinopol’skij, svt. Traktaty 223–248” [“St. Photius of Constantinople. Amphilochia. Treatises 223–248”]. Bible and Christian Antiquity, no. 4 (4), pp. 44–76 (in Russian).Dulière W.-L. Les «Dictyaques» de Denys d’Egée ou les dilemmes du sic et non de la médecine antique. Histoire d’un procédé dialectique // L’Antiquité сlassique. 1965. Vol. 34. P. 506–518.Boudon-Millot V. (ed.) (2007) Galien. Œuvres. T. 1. Introduction générale. Sur l’ordre de ses propres livres. Sur les propres livres. Que l’excellent médecin est aussi philosophe. Paris: Les Belles lettres.Eijk P., van der, Geller M., Lehmhaus L., Martelli M., Salazar C. Canons, Authorities and Medical Practice in the Greek Medical Encyclopaedias of Late Antiquity and in the Talmud // Wissen in Bewegung: Institution — Iteration — Transfer / hsgb. E. Cancik-Kirschbaum, A. Traninger. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2015. S. 195–221.Bouras-Vallianatos P. (2019) “Galen in Late Antique Medical Handbooks”, in P. Bouras-Vallianatos, B. Zipser (eds.) Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Galen. Leiden: Brill, pp. 38–61.Eijk P., van der. Principles and Practices of Compilation and Abbreviation in the Medical «Encyclopaedias» of Late Antiquity // Condensing Text — Condensed Texts / ed. M. Horster, C. Reitz. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2010. P. 519–554.Canfora L. (1998) “Il ‘Reading circle’ intorno a Fozio”. Byzantion, vol. 68, pp. 222–223.Irigoin J. Survie et renouveau de la littérature antique à Constantinople (IXe siècle) // Cahiers de civilisation médiévale. 1962. Vol. 5. P. 287–302.Cavallo G. (2006) Lire à Byzance. Paris: Les Belles lettres.Marganne M.-H. La «Bibliothèque médicale» de Photios // Medicina nei secoli. Arte e scienza. 2010. Vol. 22 (1–3). P. 509–529.Dulière W.-L. (1965) “Les ‘Dictyaques’ de Denys d’Egée ou les dilemmes du sic et non de la médecine antique. Histoire d’un procédé dialectique”. L’Antiquité classique, vol. 34, pp. 506–518.Marganne M.-H. Le livre médicale dans le monde gréco-romaine. Liège: CEDOPAL-Éditions de l’Université de Liège, 2004.Eijk P., van der (2010) “Principles and Practices of Compilation and Abbreviation in the Medical ‘Encyclopaedias’ of Late Antiquity”, in M. Horster, C. Reitz (eds.) Condensing Text — Condensed Texts. Stuttgart: Steiner, pp. 519–554.Scarborough J. Theodora, Aetius of Amida, and Procopius: Some Possible Connections // Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies. 2013. Vol. 53. P. 742–762.Eijk P., van der, Geller M., Lehmhaus L., Martelli M., Salazar C. (2015) “Canons, Authorities and Medical Practice in the Greek Medical Encyclopaedias of Late Antiquity and in the Talmud”, in E. Cancik-Kirschbaum, A. Traninger (eds.) Wissen in Bewegung: Institution — Iteration — Transfer. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 195–221.Staden H., van. Rupture and Continuity: Hellenistic Reflections on the History of Medicine // Ancient Histories of Medicine. Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity / ed. Ph. van der Eijk. Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill, 1999. P. 143–187.Henry R. (ed.) (1959–1977) Photius. Bibliothèque, vol. 1–8. Paris: Les Belles lettres.Irigoin J. (1962) “Survie et renouveau de la littérature antique à Constantinople (IXe siècle)”.Irigoin J. (1962) “Survie et renouveau de la littérature antique à Constantinople (IXe siècle)”.Cahiers de civilisation médiévale, vol. 5, pp. 287–302.Cahiers de civilisation médiévale, vol. 5, pp. 287–302.Laourdas B., Westerink L. G. (eds.) (1983–1988) Photius. Epistulae et Amphilochia, vol. 1–6. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Laourdas B., Westerink L. G. (eds.) (1983–1988) Photius. Epistulae et Amphilochia, vol. 1–6. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Marganne M.-H. (2004) Le livre médicale dans le monde gréco-romaine. Liège: CEDOPAL-Éditions de l’Université de Liège.Marganne M.-H. (2004) Le livre médicale dans le monde gréco-romaine. Liège: CEDOPAL-Éditions de l’Université de Liège.Marganne M.-H. (2010) “La ‘Bibliothèque médicale’ de Photios”. Medicina nei secoli. Arte e scienza, vol. 22 (1–3), pp. 509–529.Marganne M.-H. (2010) “La ‘Bibliothèque médicale’ de Photios”. Medicina nei secoli. Arte e scienza, vol. 22 (1–3), pp. 509–529.Olivieri A. (ed.) (1935–1950) Aëtius Amidenus. Libri medicinales, vol. 1–2. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Olivieri A. (ed.) (1935–1950) Aëtius Amidenus. Libri medicinales, vol. 1–2. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Raeder H. (ed.) (1928–1933) Oribasius. Collectionum medicarum reliquiae, vol. 1–2. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Raeder H. (ed.) (1928–1933) Oribasius. Collectionum medicarum reliquiae, vol. 1–2. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Scarborough J. (2013) “Theodora, Aetius of Amida, and Procopius: Some Possible Connections”. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, vol. 53, pp. 742–762.Scarborough J. (2013) “Theodora, Aetius of Amida, and Procopius: Some Possible Connections”. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, vol. 53, pp. 742–762.Staden H., van (1999) “Rupture and Continuity: Hellenistic Reflections on the History of Medicine”, in Ph. van der Eijk (ed.) Ancient Histories of Medicine. Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity. Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill, pp. 143–187.Staden H., van (1999) “Rupture and Continuity: Hellenistic Reflections on the History of Medicine”, in Ph. van der Eijk (ed.) Ancient Histories of Medicine. Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity. Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill, pp. 143–187.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.