<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">patristic</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Библия и христианская древность</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Bible and Christian Antiquity</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2658−7815</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-1122</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Московская духовная академия</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31802/BCA.2024.21.1.007</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">patristic-125</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЗАМЕТКИ И БИБЛИОГРАФИЧЕСКИЕ ОБЗОРЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>NOTES AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC REVIEW</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Современное изучение Первой книги Еноха: обзор двух монографий</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Contemporary Study of the First Enoch: Review of Two Monographs</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Вевюрко</surname><given-names>И. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Veviurko</surname><given-names>I. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Илья Сергеевич Вевюрко</p><p>кандидат философских наук</p><p>доцент кафедры философии религии и религиоведения философского факультета; доцент богословского факультета ПСТГУ</p><p>119234, Москва, Ленинские горы, МГУ,</p><p>учебно-научный корпус «Шуваловский», философский факультет</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ilia S. Veviurko</p><p>PhD in Philosophy</p><p>Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy of Religion and Religion Studies; Associate Professor at the Department of Theology</p><p>Leninskie Gory, Shuvalovsky Building, Moscow 119234</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова; ПСТГУ</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Moscow State University; Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University Department of Philosophy</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><elocation-id>238–252</elocation-id><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Вевюрко И.С., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Вевюрко И.С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Veviurko I.S.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.patristic.ru/jour/article/view/125">https://www.patristic.ru/jour/article/view/125</self-uri><abstract><p>Книги Еноха, как, впрочем, и другие апокрифы, остаются во многом маргинальной областью исследований, хотя и немало видных учёных работало и работает в этой области, в том числе учёных-библеистов. Опасение, с которым богословие относится к «отречённым книгам», исторически понятно и догматически оправданно. Тем не менее следует иметь в виду, что апокрифы содержат в себе очень много пересечений как с канонической библейской традицией, так и с неотречёнными формами, не вошедшими в библейский канон, но вошедшими в Священное Предание, в связи с чем их изучение не только важно для герменевтики этих текстов, но и может дать светским исследователям обильный материал для их критики, что не позволяет богословам игнорировать их, равно как и вопросы об авторстве, мотивации создания апокрифической и псевдоэпиграфической литературы, о причинах и путях проникновения в канон параллелей (и даже буквальных совпадений) с ней. В данном обзоре мы знакомим читателя с двумя недавними (2013 и 2023 г.) монографиями по книгам Еноха, посвящёнными главным образом Первой книге Еноха как самому большому и значительному апокрифу из этого ряда. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p> The books of Enoch, as well as other apocrypha, mostly remain a marginal field of research, although many prominent scholars, including biblical ones, have worked and are working in this field. The apprehension with which theology treats «repudiated books» is historically understandable and dogmatically reasoned. Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the apocrypha contain a lot of intersections both with the canonical biblical tradition and with non- repudiated texts that are not included in the biblical canon, but included in the Sacred Tradition, and therefore their study is not only important for the hermeneutics of these texts, but also it can provide secular researchers with abundant material for their criticism, which does not al- low theologians to ignore them, as well as questions about authorship of apocryphal and pseudepigraphic literature, motivation for its creation, reasons and ways of penetration into the canon of parallels (and even literal coincidences) with it. In this review, the reader is introduced into two recent (2013 and 2023) monographs on the books of Enoch, mainly devoted to the First of them, as the largest and most significant apocrypha in this seria.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Енох</kwd><kwd>апокрифы</kwd><kwd>псевдоэпиграфы</kwd><kwd>библеистика</kwd><kwd>Ветхий Завет</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>apocrypha</kwd><kwd>pseudepigrapha</kwd><kwd>heresies</kwd><kwd>biblical studies</kwd><kwd>church history</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Argall R. 1 Enoch and Sirach: A Comparative Literary and Conceptual Analysis of the Themes of Revelation, Creation and Judgment. Atlanta (Ga.): Scholars Press, 1995. (SBL Early Judaism and Its Literature; vol. 8).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Argall R. 1 Enoch and Sirach: A Comparative Literary and Conceptual Analysis of the Themes of Revelation, Creation and Judgment. Atlanta (Ga.): Scholars Press, 1995. (SBL Early Judaism and Its Literature; vol. 8).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Assefa D. L’Apocalypse des animaux (1 Hen 85–90): une propagande militaire? Approches narrative, historico-critique, perspectives théologiques. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2007. (Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism; vol. 120).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Assefa D. L’Apocalypse des animaux (1 Hen 85–90): une propagande militaire? Approches narrative, historico-critique, perspectives théologiques. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2007. (Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism; vol. 120).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Black M. The Book of Enoch, or I Enoch: A New English Edition with Commentary and Textual Notes. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1985. (Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigrapha; vol. 7).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Black M. The Book of Enoch, or I Enoch: A New English Edition with Commentary and Textual Notes. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1985. (Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigrapha; vol. 7).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Enoch: A New Translation. The Ethiopic Book of Enoch, or 1 Enoch / transl. with annot. and cross ref. by D. C. Olson in consult. with Abp. Melkesedek Workeneh. North Richland Hills (Tex.): BIBAL Press, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Enoch: A New Translation. The Ethiopic Book of Enoch, or 1 Enoch / transl. with annot. and cross ref. by D. C. Olson in consult. with Abp. Melkesedek Workeneh. North Richland Hills (Tex.): BIBAL Press, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lindars B. A Bull, a Lamb and a Word: 1 Enoch XC. 38 // New Testament Studies. 1976. Vol. 22. P. 483–486.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lindars B. A Bull, a Lamb and a Word: 1 Enoch XC. 38 // New Testament Studies. 1976. Vol. 22. P. 483–486.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nickelsburg G. Enochic Wisdom: An Alternative to the Mosaic Torah? // Hesed ve-emet: Studies in Honor of Ernest S. Frerichs / ed. by J. Magness and S. Gitin. Atlanta (Ga.): Scholars Press, 1998. (Brown Judaic Studies; vol. 320). Р. 123–132.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nickelsburg G. Enochic Wisdom: An Alternative to the Mosaic Torah? // Hesed ve-emet: Studies in Honor of Ernest S. Frerichs / ed. by J. Magness and S. Gitin. Atlanta (Ga.): Scholars Press, 1998. (Brown Judaic Studies; vol. 320). Р. 123–132.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nickelsburg G. W. E., VanderKam J. C. 1 Enoch 2: A Commentary on the Book of Enoch, Chapters 37–82. Minneapolis (Minn.): Fortress Press, 2012. (Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nickelsburg G. W. E., VanderKam J. C. 1 Enoch 2: A Commentary on the Book of Enoch, Chapters 37–82. Minneapolis (Minn.): Fortress Press, 2012. (Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Orlov A. A. The Enoch-Metatron Tradition. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005. (Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism; vol. 107).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Orlov A. A. The Enoch-Metatron Tradition. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005. (Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism; vol. 107).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Orlov A. A. Divine Mysteries in the Enochic Tradition. Berlin; Boston (Mass.): W. de Gruyter, 2023. (Ekstasis: Religious Experience from Antiquity to the Middle Ages; vol. 11).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Orlov A. A. Divine Mysteries in the Enochic Tradition. Berlin; Boston (Mass.): W. de Gruyter, 2023. (Ekstasis: Religious Experience from Antiquity to the Middle Ages; vol. 11).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Olson D. C. A New Reading of the Animal Apocalypse of 1 Enoch: «All Nations Shall be Blessed». With a New Translation and Commentary. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2013. (Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigrapha; vol. 24).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Olson D. C. A New Reading of the Animal Apocalypse of 1 Enoch: «All Nations Shall be Blessed». With a New Translation and Commentary. Leiden; Boston (Mass.): Brill, 2013. (Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigrapha; vol. 24).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tiller P. A. A Commentary on the Animal Apocalypse of I Enoch. Atlanta (Ga.): Scholars Press, 1993. (SBL Early Judaism and Its Literature; vol. 4).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tiller P. A. A Commentary on the Animal Apocalypse of I Enoch. Atlanta (Ga.): Scholars Press, 1993. (SBL Early Judaism and Its Literature; vol. 4).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
